Difference Between Distributive and Integrative Bargaining

Difference between Distributive and Integrative Bargaining Raymond Yang Garcia 1) The difference between distributive and integrative bargaining Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris, an entrepreneur, is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanting to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass. In a†¦show more content†¦In this error, a negotiator views another party through a narrow lens of one attribute. As a result, this one attribute acts like a screen, keeping the negotiator from accurately viewing multiple traits. For example, our entrepreneur Chris may have observed that Matt does a poor job trimming bushes. Consequently, observation could override other considerations that might have more relevance to the job at hand. Another perceptual error is selective perception, which describes how we categorize and interpret information in a way that favors one category or interpretation over another. There are a variety of reasons why individuals are susceptible to selective perception, but it stems from a person’s prior experiences – relating known information to the current circumstance. Selective perception usually perpetuates stereotypes and halo-effect. The final error is projection, where an individual’s current emotional state tends to influence the perception of others. It is generally a defense mechanism intended to protect an individual’s self-concept. For example, if Chris previously had someone who poorly cut his lawn and Matt looked like him, Chris may consider Matt’s services undesirable. 3) The challenges that come from multiparty negotiations Multiparty negotiations occur when more than two parties are working together to achieve an objective. Overall, increasing the number of negotiators creates complexity and multiple priorities andShow MoreRelatedIntegrative Negotiation1356 Words   |  6 PagesIntegrative Negotiation By MGT 5193.E2 February 16, 2011 Definition of Integrative bargaining states that; it is a negotiation between the parties when the parties are not experiencing a direct conflict over an issue and they want to be benefitted from discussions(Negotiations betweena union†¦,n.d.). Integrative negotiation is a process in which the party’s goal is to develop a result which is benefitted to both of them. Integrative bargaining is also known as win-winRead MoreIntegrative and Distributive Negotiations1059 Words   |  5 PagesIntegrative and Distributive Bargaining Whether a negotiation involves working together toward a goal or working against one another to win, each party must use a strategy to reach a solution. The differences of distributive bargaining and integrative bargaining are parallel. The ways in which one method is competitive and the other is cooperative is described and related to a well-known case involving basketball player Juwan Howard. Distributive Bargaining In a competitive bargaining situationRead MoreNegotiation Is A Process Of Interpersonal Decision Making Essay1405 Words   |  6 PagesNegotiation is defined as a dialogue between two or more parties or people indenting to reach an outcome or resolve a conflict. It may also be defined as a process of interpersonal decision making. There are two approaches to negotiation such as Distributive and Integrative negotiation approaches. The integrative negotiation is described as a set of tactics which are applied so as to improve both quality and likelihood of the negotiation process. It is also termed as interest based or principledRead MoreDifference Between Distributive And Mediation1526 Words   |  7 Pagesmeaning of distributive bargaining and mediation with several key features of each strategy. The main differences between distributive and mediation in dispute resolution will elaborate further in this paper. Further, advantages and disadvantages of both strategies will also listed below attached with examples of implying each approach that will use in different situations. Findings and argument explained below can generalize into a short summery, not many scholars will suggest to use distributive approachRead MoreIntegrative Bargaining1736 Words   |  7 Pagesdemonstrate that integrative bargaining can and should be used as an effective tool for negotiations in situations where unequal bargaining power e xist. It has been defined for this essay that integrative bargaining is the process of defining goals that allow both sides to achieve their objectives, and engage in a process that permits both parties to maximize their objectives (Lewicki, 2007). Integrative bargaining can be used as an effective strategy to manoeuvre out from under superior bargaining power beingRead MoreThe Problem Of Distributive Bargaining795 Words   |  4 PagesOpposing interests, exchange of goods or service, and terms of agreements, are but a few reasons conflict can arise between parties. These controversies can stem from business or personal relationships, and be held in formal or informal settings, but all require some form of resolution in order to satisfy or assuage the parties involved. Negotiation, or bargaining, is a common method used to obtain resolution. A variety of strategies can be employed in this process, some with more favorable outcomesRead MoreBusiness Law ( Negotiation And Conflict Management )1525 Words   |  7 PagesAmir Salar Tavangar Business Law (Negotiation and Conflict Management) Work Assignment #1 September 10, 2015 Fall 2015 Negotiation is a method by which people settle differences. As our book describes â€Å"it is also a form of decision making in which two or more parties talk to one another as opposing their opposing interest†. Therefore, each negation has to have a certain components in order to be qualified as negotiation. First, there should be at least two or more than two parties that have a disagreementRead MoreNegotiation Strategy Article Analysis1105 Words   |  5 Pagesin the work setting. Negotiation Articles The first article is from is from eTurboNews (2010), which is a global travel industry news periodical. The title of the article is â€Å"American Airlines union pushes for strike.† The negotiation is between American Airlines and the Transport Workers Union that represents the mechanics and other ground workers at American Airlines. The union represents 28,000 workers at American and its regional arm, American Eagle. The strategy that the unionRead MoreThe Role of Negotiation in Conflict Resolution Essay examples1516 Words   |  7 Pagesthat conflict is essential characteristics of organisational life. Role of manager is paramount with regard to negotiating the conflict that arises in organisational life (http://www.sagepub.com/). Often lack of effective and direct communication between the employees or employees and management are major contributory factor towards the organisational conflict. Failure of manger to establish direct communication with the employees can be also regarded as principle factor behind the organisationalRead MoreNegotiation by Lewicki1690 Words   |  7 Pagesand negotiation. Part Two examines the processes of communication, persuasion, and ethical judgment. Part Three explores external influences on negotiations, including the social context, coalition or group participation, individual personality differences, and cultural factors. The final chapters discuss w ays for parties and third-parties to address breakdowns in the negotiation process. The text includes a bibliography and a comprehensive index. Negotiation Basics The negotiation situation is